<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gravy834.com &#187; SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gravy834.com/category/seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gravy834.com</link>
	<description>SEO God in the making!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 08:56:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Are you losing search engine rankings due to 404 errors?</title>
		<link>http://www.gravy834.com/2009/03/25/are-you-losing-search-engine-rankings-due-to-404-errors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravy834.com/2009/03/25/are-you-losing-search-engine-rankings-due-to-404-errors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gravy834</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google SERP's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravy834.com/?p=203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few weeks ago a friend came to me wondering why his search engine positions had suddenly dropped from 3 to 182 for his main keyword.
Well it turns out he had restructured his site, changing from static pages to a dynamic WordPress site. The title tags, and content remained the same and the new pages [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravy834.com/2009/03/25/are-you-losing-search-engine-rankings-due-to-404-errors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bye Bye duplicate content, Canonical URLs to the rescue!</title>
		<link>http://www.gravy834.com/2009/02/17/bye-bye-duplicate-content-canonical-urls-to-the-rescue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravy834.com/2009/02/17/bye-bye-duplicate-content-canonical-urls-to-the-rescue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gravy834</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ecommerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canonical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[url]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravy834.com/?p=152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well it&#8217;s not strictly true, duplicate content will still be an issue for a lot of sites!
Anyway, last week at SMX West, Google, Yahoo and MSN announced that they now accept the rel=&#8221;canonical&#8221; variable.

What does this mean?
Let&#8217;s take a look at Majestic Wine. Their site uses a large database which displays wines based on your [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravy834.com/2009/02/17/bye-bye-duplicate-content-canonical-urls-to-the-rescue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

